Skip to navigation | Skip to content



An Economy Not Worth Saving

An economy that is dependent on people buying things they don’t need, ever new gewgaws and gadgets, with money they don’t have, is not worth saving. An economy that has to grow just to cover its own debts is not worth saving. An economy dependent on the energy of fossil fuels to avoid collapse is not worth saving. Why is an economy where most of the profits go to one percent of the population worth saving?

Our current economic system, which might be called global corporatism, is based on growth fueled by IOUs. The IOUs are not only to banks, but to future decades; not merely financial debts, which could be cured by hyperinflation or default, but real debts—that is, debts to the land and the air and the water—that we can’t just buy our way out of. Skimping on maintenance is an IOU. Burning carbon is an IOU—a big one. Squeezing the middle classes into working more for less is an IOU. Increasing poverty and poor health is an IOU that society will have to pay—now and also later.

While it is true that the financial meltdown and the catastrophic gulf oil leak can be partly blamed on the lack of oversight by the government, especially during the Bush administration, the roots of the problems are in the structure of the economy itself. That is, an economy hooked on growth spurred by fossil fuel energy and controlled (if that is the right word) by global corporations whose sole purpose is amassing monetary profit. If a corporation can make money by shifting the cost of redeeming their IOUs onto the public, they generally do so, whether the corporations are in the business of extraction or merely playing financial games. What a coup! Let the public pay, then let’s all give ourselves another fat bonus. Greed is called a virtue. How can such a morally corrupt system be worth saving?

Let the recession come. The earth needs a recession, badly, globally. The future needs a recession—not a “correction,” but a recession, and a long one. The earth needs a permanent recession. Society needs a permanent recession. It’s time to turn off the lights and to roll up our sleeves. There is a lot of work to do. And let’s make the gamblers do their part, like everyone else. They are very smart, after all: maybe they could learn to do something useful, such as repairing radios. Maybe they could learn to hoe some of the cream they’ve been skimming off back into the soil of the commons.

Creating money with IOUs is like using a drug—like, say, cocaine. “Stimulus.” The pushers move in, everyone feels good for a while. Then we are all hooked. And not only hooked, but in denial. “How could burning the earth’s carbon warm the climate? The scientists might be wrong.” We’ll deny it to the end. We’d rather fight than switch. The specter of bread lines is paraded before us. We’ll bail out our rich pushers if they bust, so we’ll be sure to get our next fix.

As in “the first one is free,” during the growth cycle life is easy. Since maintenance and cleanup are being charged to the future, it feels like prosperity, so no one makes a stink that the lion’s share of the profits are going into a few pockets. Then the bills start to come due: a shipment gets busted, there is an accident, people are getting sick or dying from the waste of the slag heap. Then the pushers double the price and make their demands: work harder, maintain this sick system or you’ll be hurting. While in the euphoria of the early stages of addiction, we hardly noticed that our once viable alternatives were disappearing. Having done their work of consuming the resources of the earth, both natural and cultural, having exhausted the last government bailout, the mega-corporations will simply close their doors and let the sand dunes bury their once proud windows.

As any junkie knows, tapering off voluntarily is extremely difficult. Why suffer when the cure is right there, in the pipe? So almost always a junkie uses the dope until it is all gone. Then it’s panic and cold turkey. Then you can’t work, because you are too sick. And you are nasty, and desperate. You’re ready to steal, or kill.

Tapering down—say, cutting your dose in half, and then in half again—requires a resolve that is rare, but it can be done. First you have to face the truth: that growth cannot continue forever with IOUs sent to the future. As Lenny Bruce said: “You gotta pay dues.” It’s going to hurt but if we are all in it together we can commiserate and figure out how to get by. Maybe we could have a neighborhood barbecue: start it with the last cup of diesel and burn paper money and coupons and the national debt. Or we could write checks for ten thousand dollars each and burn them. We could grill some rats and share them around, the way Jesus fed the five thousand. We could sing sad songs but we could all be in it together.

There are plenty of rascals in our government, both elected and appointed, who seem to place the next quarter’s bottom line of their corporate donors above the common good. Of course we need to throw the rascals out. Of course we need to demand that our government reinstitute regulation and independent, scientific oversight of our environment and our industry. But we also have to give up our addiction to consumption and false mantra of “growth” that is, really, simply the looting of the future.

Sustainable cultures are not built overnight. Generations are required—not only for particular skills and techniques to be developed, but for the social and philosophical and spiritual values that underpin such cultures. We have lingered an extra hundred years in our adolescence, binging like teenagers: find oil, use it all up; get the most toys; get the most money. Profligacy has been our mark, and not in a sacred manner.

We need to mature into a post-growth adulthood, in which we can find comfort and grace in a long slow recession—otherwise we will be the only species to move from adolescence to senescence with no maturity in between.

7 comments

  1. Sirius Alchemy writes:

    Nice. I just heard an absolutely erudite discourse on similar matters by John Greer entitled “The Ecotechnic Future”. I dont know if Id prescribe any book more at this moment in time.

    http://thearchdruidreport.blogspot.com/

    July 7th, 2010 at 2:11 am

  2. Anna writes:

    Wow— petroleum “addiction” is not a new idea but this actually extends the metaphor in a frighteningly successful way.
    Will the resulting anarchy be regenerative or barbaric? Will we be humbled by our demonstrated foolishness, or continue to find someone to blame? Can millions of people actually die of a broken heart?

    August 8th, 2010 at 9:20 am

  3. WENDY TREMAYNE writes:

    Right back atcha!
    http://blog.holyscraphotsprings.com/search?q=depression
    http://blog.holyscraphotsprings.com/2008/09/greater-depression-renaissance-finding.html

    August 18th, 2010 at 11:17 am

  4. Tim writes:

    I think you wrote your article/rant well except for one thing; the “let it burn” argument may well result in the death of a large part of the worlds population. it’s not just a matter of churning our own butter as we update our blogs I don’t think. When the lights go out, the Internet probably isn’t far behind it. Then there is no oranges, no fleece sweaters, and no Corona. There are root vegetables and cold water baths. There is subsistence. I would like it much better if the many “let it burn” posters had some kind of transition strategy that wasn’t so… weak.

    August 19th, 2010 at 6:57 am

  5. Dale Pendell writes:

    A transition strategy–yes. Good idea. But there must be something better than propping up the system that has created the problem to start with. I mean, the resource base doesn’t change in a financial collapse–only the monetary system. My own suggestions, variously posted, include bailing out the economy by giving the money directly to the people, enacting the “fee and dividend” carbon tax (not cap and trade), doing away with corporate “personhood,” and encouraging local currencies. If all the money in the world were to suddenly disappear, there would still be just as much food.
    Thanks for your comment. By the way, as far as the lights going out, I tell some stories on that theme in The Great Bay. You might not like it at all, but … they are just stories.
    d.

    August 19th, 2010 at 3:08 pm

  6. Mike writes:

    Tim, I think you don’t quite get the point 100%. Nobody is suggesting that we revert back to living like cavemen. You may not have oranges in January in Canada, but the upside to that is the oranges won’t have to be shipped thousands of miles to far off lands consuming gallon after gallon of diesel fuel. And the internet won’t go anywhere, ISPs and governments have made sure that if the worst were to happen (like a global economic meltdown) that the internet will stay alive. Granted they might take it away from us puny little idiot civilians, but that will give us time to go outside and tend to our root crops in the garden.

    August 20th, 2010 at 10:26 am

  7. jojo writes:

    What really gets me are all the people using food stamps while playing on their iphone 4’s in my checkout line.

    September 3rd, 2010 at 12:15 pm

Leave a comment

  1. (required)
  2. (valid email required)
  3. (required)
  4. Send as
  5. Please answer the security question below:
 

cforms contact form by delicious:days


Archives